|
|

Only 6% of the original old
growth forest is in national
parks and nature reserves,
the rest is available for logging. The Department of Conservation
and Land Management (CALM) manages the State
forest for wood production and receives money from the
sale of trees from these forests (royalties).
It is useful for CALM to have
even-aged forests, dominated by excellent timber trees, karri
and jarrah, rather than the diverse old growth forest ecosystem.
|
Logging
in the old growth forest
The intensive logging
practices used by CALM and the native timber industry
have large impacts on the forest ecosystem, many of
which are irreversible. Current logging practices require
extensive road construction, which leads to permanent
removal of forests and allows access for fire, feral
animals and disease. An area equivalent to 23 Subiaco
football ovals is logged every day. The forest ecosystems
become fragmented and structural
diversity and varied habitat,
such as big old trees with hollows, are removed over
large areas. Freshwater ecosystems may become polluted.
The soil is disturbed by the heavy machinery and nutrients
depleted.
|
 |
 |
Clearfelling
In the karri/marri forest
the main method of logging used is called clearfelling.
This is where the undergrowth is flattened and useable
tree-trunks are removed. The remaining vegetation is
bulldozed into piles for burning in a very hot fire
called a regeneration burn. About two "habitat" trees
are left standing per hectare. The native vegetation
is left to regrow. In the karri forests CALM replants
the area with karri seedlings.
The jarrah forest is logged
using a smaller scale version of clearfelling followed
by a hot regeneration burn. CALM leaves about four habitat
trees per hectare.
CALM plans to clearfell
karri regrowth in 100 years time and jarrah regrowth
in 150 years time. This doesn't allow time for hollows
to form so, as old
growth forest is converted to regrowth
forest, habitats
are being lost. For example, it takes at least 168 years
for hollows to form in karri trees; 300 years in jarrah
trees and 200 years for hollows to form in marri trees.
In our south west forests 51 species of mammals and
birds depend on hollows in trees for habitat and nesting
sites.
These massive disturbances
to the forest have significantly reduced its ability
to restore itself and outbreaks of diseases such as
dieback, leaf miner
and brown rot fungus in regrowth forests are very common.
|
|
Woodchipping
The great bulk of trees
taken from the forest during logging end up as woodchips
or low quality products. Since 1976, 16 million tonnes
of karri-marri woodchips have been exported to Japan
for paper pulp - almost all came from old growth forest.
The logging industry argues that only forest residue
is woodchipped but forest residue is a misleading term.
The general public thinks of forest residue as the branches
and rubbish left after logging but those bits are burnt
in the regeneration fire. What is woodchipped is third
grade karri sawlogs and 99% of all the marri trees felled
in the clearfell process. Those forests, left standing,
are worth far more to our tourist industry, beekeepers
and fine woodcraft workers.
|

WOODCHIP
PILE AT BUNBURY PORT
|
 |
"The
role of woodchipping in forest destruction in WA"-
RTF file
|
 |
"Summary
history of woodchipping in Western Australia 1969 - 1999"-
RTF file |
 |
Fire
Our native flora and fauna
have evolved with fire and some species may need particular
types of fire to continue existing. However, recent
forest management practices have increased the frequency
and intensity of burning. Fire can be damaging if it
is not applied with sufficient knowledge of how and
what type of fire should be used in a particular ecosystem.
|
Inappropriate burning can lead
to:
-
loss of nutrients in the
soil
-
invasion of weeds
-
invasion of feral animals
such as foxes and cats
-
wildfires
-
loss of fauna and their
habitats
-
loss of fire sensitive species,
ecological communities and micro habitats
-
spread of diseases
- damage to aquatic ecosystems
-
damage to regrowth forest
(Friends of the Chuditch,
1998)
Gaps in scientific knowledge
make it difficult to balance the benefits and costs of using
fire. A cautious approach should be taken to burning until
its impacts and its role in ecosystems
and biodiversity is better
understood.
|
|